Over the last 30 years, America has “squandered” the educational lead it previously held over the rest of the world, according to New York Times columnist David Brooks.
Speaking February 8th at the Economic Club of Grand Rapids, the conservative columnist said regaining that edge will require an increasing emphasis on “human capital,” including expanded investment in early childhood programs.
"The investment return on early childhood is higher than on any other human capital investment we make," Brooks said. “We have a public culture that is biased in favor of things you can count.”
Despite that, Brooks said he’s seen signs of a “cognitive revolution” across the nation over the past five years, based on a dawning awareness that K-12 school reforms by themselves have yielded “disappointing results” and that vital learning takes place in the years from birth to age five.
Brooks said researchers are increasingly recognizing the important contributions made to learning by “unconscious” traits, including self control, the ability to attach to others, and the development of a work ethic.
Many children, he said, fail to develop those skills early on owing to family difficulties or poor parenting and thus do poorly in school. Programs like home nurse visits, preschool and others can help fill the gaps.
“If you’re going to teach the mind, early is better,” he said.
The problem, he added, is that expanding early childhood programs will require a sincere buy-in by politicians, who tend to pay lip service to anything they perceive as only producing benefits “20 years out.”
The solution, he said, is simple.
“Bug them.”
In a question and answer session following his talk, Brooks added that some conservatives worry that early childhood programs are “paternalistic” government intrusions.
“That’s not our culture. And yet many of the things that work are incredibly paternalistic,” he said.
To read the Grand Rapids Press story on the Brooks’ speech, click here.
-- Andy Heller


.png)

.png)
I couldn't agree more
I couldn't agree more regarding the necessity of investing in quality early education (birth to age 5)! I know that the "at risk" populations are the target for increasing funding but privileged children who fail to learn vital social skills also grow up to contribute negatively to society. Several children from wealthy homes grow up suffering from narcissism and consequently break laws, become addicts and end up costing the tax payers millions in "rehabilitation". We've got to stop targeting "at risk" populations alone; all children need to be in quality care programs that teach them their abc's and how to function in society with others. If there was funding for middle-class families to send their children to preschool, they would. And if there were funding for more research and education for all parents, then priviledged populations would also invest in early childhood education and we would see a difference in prison populations and the quality of society in general!